Skip to main content

Search

Image
Power infrastructure
Commentary May 2026

How constraints are shaping data infrastructure

In data infrastructure, connectivity—and the constraints around it—is increasingly determining which assets can be built, scaled and able to deliver durable returns

Key takeaways

  • Constraints, not demand, are increasingly determining where data infrastructure can be built and scaled—power, land, permitting and connectivity define which projects are viable
  • Assets with secured power, strategic locations and interconnection supported by long-term contracts are best positioned to deliver resilient performance
  • Control of scarce inputs, execution capability and platform scale are the primary drivers of differentiated outcomes and can help investors capture today’s opportunity

A structural shift in infrastructure investing

Data infrastructure—data centers, fiber networks and towers—has become a core area of infrastructure investing, supported by strong underlying demand from cloud computing, mobile usage and artificial intelligence (AI).

These trends are well understood. What is less appreciated is that connectivity, and the constraints around it, are increasingly determining returns. As a result, outcomes are no longer defined simply by demand alone, but by where infrastructure can be delivered and which assets can be successfully developed and expanded over time.

Data infrastructure operates as an integrated system, where performance depends on access to power, location and network connectivity. Constraints in any of these inputs can limit the ability to deliver capacity, even where demand is strong.

What was once a broad-based buildout opportunity has become more selective. In this environment, scale of capital and execution capability are critical.

For example, mobile broadband coverage now reaches 96% of the global population, yet a usage gap of more than three billion people—nearly 40% of the world—persists (Figure 1). This suggests that there is significant scope for increased data usage and the need for the infrastructure to deliver it. 

Figure 1: Connectivity is widely available, but adoption remains incomplete

Image
Global mobile internet connectivity

Source: The GSMA Mobile Connectivity Index, as of May 2026. See endnote 1.

Connectivity, digital maturity and opportunity

Digital infrastructure spans a set of interconnected assets that enable the generation, transmission and storage of data. These include data centers, which provide compute and storage capacity; fiber networks, which carry high-capacity traffic; telecom towers and small cells, which support wireless connectivity; and satellite systems, which extend coverage to underserved regions. 

Together, these assets form an integrated system, with each layer dependent on the others to deliver connectivity at scale. 

Infrastructure development remains uneven across regions, reflecting different stages of digital maturity (Figure 2). In some markets, the priority remains expanding basic coverage. In others, rapid adoption is driving network densification and increasing demand for fiber and interconnection. More developed markets, while highly penetrated, are increasingly constrained by limits on power, land and network capacity.

Figure 2: Where constraints are emerging

Image
Where constraints are emerging

Across all environments, the underlying pattern is consistent: the ability to deliver infrastructure is shaped less by demand and more by a set of structural constraints.

In many markets, power is the binding constraint on development, with permitting and interconnection further extending timelines. More broadly, execution risk is elevated as grid expansion, regulatory processes and labor shortages can delay projects and disrupt schedules.

Connectivity is also shaped by physical limitations. Extending networks over long distances or through subsea infrastructure increases cost and complexity, while higher-frequency wireless networks require denser infrastructure to maintain performance.

Mobile data traffic continues to grow at around 20–30% annually, reinforcing the need for ongoing densification.2

Across broadband networks, connectivity increasingly behaves like a utility. Fiber supports capacity and resilience, while satellite technologies extend coverage in underserved regions.

The most compelling opportunities sit where demand is visible, but infrastructure remains incomplete or constrained.

Accelerating dynamics

AI is increasing the scale and intensity of activity across data infrastructure, while intensifying existing limitations—particularly around power and location. The outlook for data center electricity demand is highly uncertain, driven by factors including efficiency improvements, AI uptake and potential energy sector bottlenecks.

Global data center electricity demand is projected to exceed 1,000 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2030 under high-growth scenarios, reflecting the rapid expansion of AI-driven workloads (Figure 3). This represents a step change in required infrastructure. Meeting this level of demand requires a substantial expansion of power generation, grid capacity and interconnection—each of which is subject to long development timelines and structural constraints.

Figure 3: Global data center electricity demand is accelerating rapidly

Image
Global data center electricity consumption by sensitivity case

Source: International Energy Agency (IEA), “Energy and AI,” April 2025. See endnote 3.

AI workloads fall into two broad categories. Model training requires significant computing power and can be located in areas with sufficient energy availability, whereas real-time inference requires low latency, meaning infrastructure must be located close to end users.

This creates a dual requirement: large-scale, power-secured campuses and distributed, latency-sensitive infrastructure.

While some workloads can shift to power-abundant locations, much of the demand remains tied to constrained markets. AI does not fundamentally change how infrastructure is built, it increases the pressure on the inputs that already determine returns. In this context, the constraint is not demand, but the ability to deliver infrastructure in the right place, at the right time.

Defining success

In this environment, the most successful investments share a consistent set of characteristics.

They combine access to scarce inputs such as power, land and interconnection with business models that provide revenue visibility and the ability to expand over time. Long-term agreements underpin cash flows, while size and utilization allow infrastructure to be densified, extended or replicated, improving utilization as demand grows.

These attributes are critical in a market where outcomes today are shaped by physical and structural limitations. Assets that control key inputs and can expand within constrained environments tend to benefit from durable competitive advantages.

Delivering these investments requires more than capital. It depends on the ability to secure power early, navigate permitting, coordinate development and align capacity with long-term demand.4 The mismatch between infrastructure demand and delivery timelines is particularly evident in power systems (Figure 4). Infrastructure projects can take approximately 20%  longer than planned and exceed budgets by up to 80%, underscoring the importance of disciplined execution.

Figure 4: Typical deployment time by infrastructure type

Image
Typical Deployment Time by Infrastructure Type

Source: IEA, “Electricity 2026,” February 2026.

In practice, this favors investors with sufficient capital, sourcing advantages and operating expertise. The ability to originate opportunities, structure partnerships and execute complex developments determines which assets come to market.

Across data centers, fiber and towers, the same pattern emerges: returns are driven by contracted revenue, high utilization and the ability to expand within constrained environments.

Opportunity in a constrained market

Data infrastructure represents a core allocation within institutional portfolios, combining defensive characteristics with exposure to long-term digitalization trends.

The opportunity will continue to grow, but the ability to capture it will depend on where infrastructure can be delivered and how effectively real-world constraints can be navigated.

Returns will increasingly be differentiated by access to power, connectivity and strategic locations, as well as the capital and execution capability required to bring infrastructure to market.

Not all capacity is equal. Not all locations are replicable. Not all growth translates into returns.

In this environment, successful platforms combine access to constrained inputs with contracted, visible cash flows and the ability to expand over time. These characteristics allow investments to convert structural limitations into durable, infrastructure-like returns. 

In our view, the next phase of data infrastructure investing will be defined not by who builds the most, but by who can consistently identify, secure and execute on the most constrained opportunities.

Endnotes

  1. Note: Base: Total population, 197 countries. Totals may not add up due to rounding. Each year, GSMA Intelligence updates its estimates of the number of mobile internet subscribers in each country, incorporating new (and/or updated) data from operators, regulators, national statistics agencies and consumer surveys where available. In some countries and regions, estimates of mobile internet adoption may therefore differ from what was presented in previous editions of The State of Mobile Internet Connectivity. 

    Unique subscriber data is sourced from GSMA Intelligence. Coverage data is sourced from GSMA Intelligence, combining data reported by mobile operators and national regulatory authorities. Population data is sourced from the UN.

  2. PwC, “Perspectives from the Global Telecom Outlook 2024-2028,” March 2025; Omdia.
  3. Note: These numbers serve as exploratory scenarios to inform technology and policy choices. It is crucial to consider the wide range of uncertainties, including the scale of AI adoption and the efficiency with which this additional service demand will be met.

    High Growth: This case explores the impact of stronger AI adoption and increased global demand for digital services.

    Base Case: Despite the strong increase, data center electricity demand growth accounts for less than 10% of global electricity demand growth between 2024 and 2030.

    High Efficiency: In this case we assume that AI and digital services demand follows the same trajectory as in the Base Case. However, several efficiency strategies are implemented to counterbalance the increased energy demand resulting from the higher adoption of digital technologies.

    Headwinds: In this case, service demand does not grow as fast as in other scenarios, and AI sees a slower uptake.

  4. McKinsey & Company.

Disclosure

This commentary and the information contained herein are for educational and informational purposes only and do not constitute, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an advertisement for, any securities, related financial instruments or investment advisory services. This commentary discusses broad market, industry or sector trends, or other general economic or market conditions. It is not intended to provide an overview of the terms applicable to any products sponsored by Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and its affiliates (together, “Brookfield”).

This commentary contains information and views as of the date indicated and such information and views are subject to change without notice. Certain of the information provided herein has been prepared based on Brookfield’s internal research and certain information is based on various assumptions made by Brookfield, any of which may prove to be incorrect. Brookfield may have not verified (and disclaims any obligation to verify) the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein including information that has been provided by third parties and you cannot rely on Brookfield as having verified such information. The information provided herein reflects Brookfield’s perspectives and beliefs. 

Investors should consult with their advisors prior to making an investment in any fund or program, including a Brookfield-sponsored fund or program.

Key Sections